Parker, James F.

Principal
(512) 322-5878

For more than two decades, James has represented clients in complex litigation and appeals that affect not just the parties, but have broad public consequences.

As an experienced litigator, James listens closely to his clients in order to quickly learn the details of their businesses, disputes, and needs. But it’s not enough that he knows the details—he has to explain those details in terms the judge and jury will understand.  At the same time, James’ clients trust him to translate the litigation process into recommendations on which they can act.  James has been his clients’ explainer/translator in courts across the country.

But James does not focus solely on the courthouse, James recognizes that a client's needs are often best pursued through negotiation, conciliation, and mediation. So James' early involvement will often result in litigation not being undertaken at all.

And when litigation can't be avoided, James recognizes that litigation is often decided before suit is filed. Accordingly, James and his team often get involved in a dispute at the earliest possible time. When that happens, James and his team can identify potential witnesses, develop possible claims against the opposing party, and identify the most favorable venue in which to bring suit. With early involvement of a trusted litigator, a party can ensure that it can enter litigation in the best possible location and on the best possible footing.

When litigation is necessary, James has the experience to take the case from its very beginning to its ultimate conclusion. James and his team have tried numerous cases to judges and juries, obtaining favorable outcomes from both. In addition, James has argued cases in the state and federal appeals courts, obtaining favorable decisions for clients at the appellate level.

James's work frequently involves:

  • Representing public and private employers in employment litigation and pre-litigation administrative proceedings, including wage-hour disputes, discrimination and harassment claims, enforcement of covenants not compete, and ERISA actions
  • Representing clients in litigation over complicated water conveyances and property rights for river authorities, groundwater conservation districts, and municipal water districts
  • Representing clients in litigation and administrative proceedings involving contracts, permitting, and federal civil rights claims for cities and other governmental entities
  • Representing governmental clients and other stakeholders in litigation challenging governmental entities' stautory and legal authority to act
  • Representing clients in contract and tort claims, including allegations of fraud and misrepresentation, tortious interference with a contract, and personal injury in cases involving private industries –from electric utilities to oil & gas to telecommunications to specialized manufacturing
  • Admitted to State Bar of Texas (2000)
  • J.D., Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law (2000)
  • B.A., Government, The University of Texas at Austin (1997)
Representative Case Resolutions
  • Negotiated settlement with special utility district to remove territory from the district’s service area enabling the landowner to construct data centers resulting in billions of dollars in economic activity.
  • Obtained billion-dollar settlement for river authority in suit concerning the conveyance of water.
  • Enforced covenant not to compete against former executive who used his former employer’s confidential information and business goodwill to start a competing enterprise.
  • Forced closure of domestic-septage disposal operation that threatened a city’s drinking water supply through a temporary injunction proceeding.
Representative Judgments
  • In re: Winter Storm Uri Litig., MDL Master Cause No. 2021-41903 in the District Court for the 281st Judicial District, Harris County, Texas (obtaining dismissal of municipal owned utilities from multidistrict litigation following ERCOT grid collapse in the course of the 2021 winter storm).
  • State of Texas v. City of San Marcos, Cause No. 24-0267 in the District Court for the 207th Judicial District, Hays County, Texas (successfully defending the City of San Marcos’s ordinance concerning the enforcement of misdemeanor marijuana offenses).
  • Ex parte Sienna Plantation Levee Improv. Dist., No. 17-DCV-246028 in the District Court for the 240th Judicial District, Fort Bend County, Texas (validated $50,000,000 in District bonds under the Expedited Declaratory Judgments Act).
  • Tex. Comm’n on Env’t’l Quality v. City of Cleburne, No. D-1-GN-16-005692 in the District Court for the 126th Judicial District, Travis County, Texas (overturning TCEQ decision to grant registration to landowner permitting land application of domestic septage upstream of the City’s water-supply reservoir).
  • Verizon Employee Benefits Committee v. Felton, Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-0971-P in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (obtained summary judgment for the pension plan in ERISA overpayment recovery case)
  • FedEx National LTL, Inc. v. Smith Protective Services, Inc., Cause No. 08-13718 in the District Court for the 95th Judicial District, Dallas County, Texas (obtained judgment in favor of plaintiff on breach of security contract claim)
Representative Appellate Cases
  • San Jacinto River Authority v. Ackley, No. 09-22-00109-CV, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 7419 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Oct. 17, 2024, pet. filed) (obtaining dismissal of inverse-condemnation claims of landowners who claim to have been flooded by water passed through Lake Conroe Dam in the course of Hurricane Harvey).
  • City of Waco v. Citizens to Save Lake Waco, No. 10-17-00202-CV (Tex. App.—Waco July 10, 2019, no pet.) (obtaining dismissal of citizen lawsuit opposing the construction of a new landfill).
  • City of Merkel v. Copeland, 561 S.W.3d 720 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2018, pet. denied) (obtaining reversal of district court’s decision not to dismiss breach-of-contract claim against the City).
  • City of Dallas v. Abney, No. 09-16-00038-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 6140 (Tex. App.—Beaumont June 9, 2016, no pet.) (successfully defending against motion to transfer venue away from Orange County).
  • Chambers-Liberty Counties Navigation District v. State, 575 S.W.3d 339 (Tex. 2019)
  • W. Travis Cty. Pub. Util. Agency v. Travis Cty. Mun. Util. Dist. No. 12, 537 S.W.3d 549 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017, pet. denied)
  • State Bar of Texas
  • Admitted to U.S. District Courts for Western, Northern, Southern, and Eastern Districts of Texas
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
As a lifelong fan of the Texas Rangers, James has grown accustomed to disappointment and melancholy.  Fortunately, he finds solace in his family:  children Max and Sydney along with his wife, Christine (even though she is a Yankee fan). To distract him from his baseball disappointments, James enjoys developing new recipes in the kitchen and experimenting with his smoker.

Sign Up for Newsletter Updates


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact